Testing Multi-Tenant SaaS Platforms Without Disrupting Customers

Even if the development team adheres to secure coding standards and keeps dependencies up-to the latest, they may still deliver software that has a security flaw. Actual attacks do not follow an audit list. An attacker could use an untrue authorization rule and an open API endpoint, or misuse the password reset process or realize that a customer account has access to other tenant’s information.

Professional penetration testing Brisbane businesses employ to ensure security assurance examines systems from that adversarial perspective. Instead of asking if there’s security measures experienced testers will ask what controls could be bypassed.

The distinction is significant the most Australian organisations that deal with sensitive assets such as health records, financial information customer data, financial records or other assets that are considered to be sensitive.

Scanning through automated means only reveals a fraction of the truth

Vulnerability scanners are very useful. They are able to identify outdated software, insecure headers and CVEs as they also identify obvious configuration issues. But, they aren’t able to understand how an application operates.

Imagine a site for customers who wish to retrieve invoices of a different company and change their account numbers. An automated scanner will not see anything abnormal if a server is sending completely valid responses. A human tester will recognize the problem immediately.

Web penetration testing is a blend of automation and manual investigation. Testers search for weaknesses in authentication, sessions, API behavior and configuration, as well as access controls as well as injection risk API behavior.

SaaS environments pose their own security questions

Multi-tenant cloud services require be tested with care because a mistake could affect a large number of customers at the same time.

Saas penetration tests should cover tenant isolation, API authorizations, role changes, and account recovery. They should also look at integrations with other services and accounts recovery, exposure to data and API authorization. The tester shouldn’t just test if the feature works but also determine if it could be used in a way which was never planned by the developers.

For example, a user assigned a basic role might not see an administrative function within the interface. It doesn’t mean they can’t use it directly. It is necessary to test the API in order in order to distinguish this rather than just reviewing the screen.

Modern web applications offer a greater attack surface

Modern applications typically combine JavaScript front-ends APIs, cloud service, APIs, identity providers, microservices, as well as third-party integrations. There may be weaknesses in each component, as in the trust relationship that exists between the two.

Thorough web app penetration testing follows those connections. Testing could include looking at the process of generating tokens, whether the endpoints that are sensitive enforce authentication consistently, or how data stored by users is moved between services.

Siege Cyber is specialized in this type of testing for applications. It utilizes modern APIs and frameworks, as well with cloud-hosted apps and complicated architectures.

The report will aid developers fix the issue

Finding vulnerabilities is only part of the process. If engineers can replicate an issue, identify its risk and confidently remediate the issue, security testing is most valuable.

Siege Cyber reports contain evidence that includes reproduction steps and risk rating. They also provide assessments of the impact with practical remediation recommendations, as well as a detailed analysis of the impact. Business stakeholders receive an executive-level explanation of the vulnerability and technical teams receive the specifics needed to deal with the issue. Rather than waiting until the final report, crucial findings can be communicated to business stakeholders at the time of the engagement.

The retesting of the system following remediation gives another layer of assurance, as it confirms that the initial issue has been removed without the need for a new one.

For companies that require independent validation, proof of compliance or greater assurance prior to an important release testing, penetration testing offers something that the automated tools and policies can’t give you: a safe opportunity to determine how a skilled attacker might actually approach the system. The importance of the test is finding that answer before an actual adversary.

Scroll to Top