Imagine a platform for compliance is $12,000 a year. Does that sound expensive?
What it replaces will decide the answer.
If automation eliminates hundreds of hours repetitive evidence collection across a complicated technology landscape, $12,000 could be a good investment. The calculation would be different if a startup of seven individuals could gather the same evidence in just several minutes each month.
It’s a great way to start the search for Vanta. Start by asking which platform offers the most features. Think about what features save your company in actual time and effort.
Automated Manufacturing Has an Break-Even Point
Automating compliance isn’t necessarily beneficial or harmful. The benefit of compliance automation alters as the business grows. Imagine a technology company which is growing, multiple cloud environments, many applications and frequent changes to access. The manual process of collecting evidence can be a major burden for the operation. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and collect evidence may easily justify their expense.
Now think about a 10-person company that is preparing for its initial SOC 2. It could have a tiny infrastructure, and collection of evidence could be handled without a lot of automation.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. The capabilities of a sophisticated platform are amazing, but they only offer financial value when an organization needs them.
Compare Architecture not just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. It is crucial to examine the services, features and contracts offered by each platform. Both are established platform for compliance, which focuses on automation and integrations.
However, there’s another choice you’ll need to make. Do you have a company that is interested in an integration-driven platform to help with compliance? Certain businesses require automated evidence collection, as well as constant monitoring. Some companies prefer to collect evidence on their own.
Vanta Competitors Don’t Follow the Same Model
Many well-known Vanta competitors compete in a market with a similar focus on automation. It also offers lighter platforms designed around the organization of systems rather than a large amount of connectivity.
CertAssist is a part of this category. CertAssist was created by internal auditors, compliance consultants and other professionals, organizes controls frameworks in a central place. It provides editable guidelines and policies to support evidence and allows auditors to review evidence via read-only access.
It doesn’t connect to operational systems, or install infrastructure agents. Customers upload and choose the documents they would like to submit.
It is important to consider the system access.
It is evident that the removal of integrations is a disadvantage. Someone must collect evidence manually.
The compliance application does not require integration and can be used without having to establish ongoing connections to the operating environment.
Both architectures are equally excellent. It is essential to consider which choices are best to your business.
CertAssist aims at teams with five to 200 employees and gives pricing information, rather than having to have an actual sales call. The price for its launch is $225 per month in contrast to a typical price of $375 per month.
Let Complexity Earn Its Place
What a start-up with 10 employees needs today may not be the same at 500 or 100 employees.
Although compliance is easy but a lighter platform might be a good idea. As the number of employees, systems, frameworks, and requirements for evidence grow, the economics will ultimately favor more automation. Better to let the complexity of technology for compliance to earn its rightful place.
The cost of purchasing fifty integrations simply because they look attractive in a table of comparisons is not worth it. They’re worth it when doing the tasks they are replacing is more costly than manually performing them.